How to save the world from the holocaust as warned in Holy Quran?

Unmindful of glorious tradition set by Muhammad (PBUH) and the limits laid down in Quran, any man made dogma may amount to interpolation of Quranic Laws. Allah disapproves death penalty and the kind of law enacted in Pakistan.

Merits of Section 295(C): A columnist commented in DAWN dated 9/9/01 “In 1986, the criminal law (Amendment act III) was passed by the hand-picked pious members of champion of Islam General Zia ul Haq’s Majlis-e-Shoora headed by Mohammad Khan Junejo and it added section 295(C), a weapon designed to be used for personal vengeance, a weapon with scores can be settled, a weapon even to be employed for personal gain. It reads; whoever by words,, either spoken or written or by visible representation, or by imputation, innuendo, or insinuation, directly or indirectly, defiles the sacred name of the Holy Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) shall be punished with death, or imprisonment for life, and shall be liable to fine.”

Clerics demonize faithful in Mosques: A sub caption in DAWN dated 8/7/02 was “Imam two others held for attacking U.S Muslim.” A man named Faraz Javed an American by birth went to Jaranwala Faisalabad for Juma prayers. He objected to the Pesh Imam’s political speech. At that time the Imam was cursing the Pakistan government and Americans. At this, Faraz reportedly asked the Imam “Instead of blaming America you should better tell us Islamic teachings.” The Pesh Imam did not like it. He asked people sitting in the mosque to kill Faraz. “ He is also an American enemy of the Muslims.” He managed to escape from the mosque. After Juma prayers Imam Hafiz Abdul Latif was present. Some of the attackers were also carrying iron rods, sticks and lethal weapons. Only two days before this incident, there was news from the same place faisalabad, reported in DAWN dated 6/7/02, under a caption “Villager stoned to death on Imam’s call” – ‘A man of Chak Jhumra was stoned to death on Friday by villagers on call of a local Pesh Imam who had issued a decree (Fatwa) against the man accusing him of blasphemy. Maulvi Faqur Muhammad asked the enraged mob to stone him. Zahid shah sustained serious injuries during the stoning and died on the spot.’

A Bishop committed suicide:  One Masih was charged with blasphemy under the section 295(C) on the complaint of Muhammad Akram on 14/10/1996, after 7 hours of alleged utterances which he said against Islam and the Holy Prophet (PBUH). The section Judge Sahiwal had awarded death sentence to the accused on 27/4/1998. Lahore high Court confirmed his death on 24/7/2001. Then news came in DAWN dated 16/8/02 “SC ACQUITS BLASPHEMY ACCUSED”. It was pleaded in Supreme Court that Muhammad Akram wanted to grab the plot of land on which Ayub Masih and his father were resisting. It was brought on the record of the court that soon after the arrest of Ayub Masih, the complainant Muhammad Akram forcibly occupied his house in Chak No-352 falling in the jurisdiction of Arifwala Police Station. During the process Bishop John Joseph of Faisalabad had committed suicide out side the District and Session Judge, Sahiwal, after hearing the judgment earlier.

One may wonder why it not occurred to any of the Muslims involved in the judicial process to refer to Allah’s Law: “When ye hear the message of Allah held in defiance and ridicule, you are not to sit with them unless they turn to different theme.” (Quran 4:140) Why did Muhammad Akram rejoice blasphemous talk for seven long hours in defiance of Allah’s guidance in Quran?

A case of blasphemy at human level is also available in Quran. Allah charge sheeted one hypocrite named Abdullah Bin Ubai for uttering blasphemous words against Holy Prophet Muhammad (PBUH). “If we return to Madina, surely the more honorable will expel there from the manner (Allah forbid Holy Prophet)”. (Quran 63:8) The son of this hypocrite who had accepted Islam sought permission to behead his father. It was not allowed. When Abdullah Bin Ubai died, his funeral was prayed by Muhammad (PBUH) “When 'Abdullah bin 'Ubai died, his son 'Abdullah bin 'Abdullah came to Allah's Apostle and asked him to give him his shirt in order to shroud his father in it. He gave it to him and then 'Abdullah asked the Prophet to offer the funeral prayer for him (his father). Allah's Apostle got up to offer the funeral prayer for him, but Umar got up too and got hold of the garment of Allah's Apostle and said, "O Allah's Apostle Will you offer the funeral prayer for him though your Lord has forbidden you to offer the prayer for him" Allah's Apostle said, "But Allah has given me the choice by saying: '(Whether you) ask forgiveness for them, or do not ask forgiveness for them; even if you ask forgiveness for them seventy times..' so I will ask more than seventy times." 'Umar said, "But he ('Abdullah bin 'Ubai) is a hypocrite!" However, Allah's Apostle did offer the funeral prayer for him whereupon Allah revealed: 'And never (O Muhammad) pray for anyone of them that dies, nor stand at his grave.'”

There are so many exponential verses in Holy Quran on the subject of blasphemy. “Mocked were (many) messengers before thee; but their scoffers were hemmed in by the thing they mock.” (Quran 6:10 & 21:41) It implied the logic of turning of table. So the subject of settling the score is beyond human reach. Where there is talk of blasphemy, Quran commands to keep away from them. “When ye hear the message of Allah held in defiance and ridicule, you are not to sit with them unless they turn to a different theme.” (Quran 4:140) Pakistan by inventing blasphemy law against Allah’s will tarnished the name of Islam world over.

Can there be any blasphemy severe than Allah begetting a SON, which Saudi commentators say, lowers Allah to the level of an animal? Allah’s indignation for the inglorious attribute framed at human level should take human race stunned and terrified. Reflect on Allah’s warning: “And they say, ‘The Gracious God has taken unto Himself a son.’ Assuredly, you have done a most monstrous thing! The heavens might well-nigh burst thereat, and the earth cleaves asunder, and the mountains fall down in pieces, because they ascribe a son to the Gracious God.” (Quran 19:88-90).

The most monstrous utterance of blasphemy is the belief Allah begetting a son. It is stupendous blasphemy against Allah. In spite of this, when Christians delegate headed by a Bishop came to Madina from Najaf for a debate with Muhammad (PBUH), they were allowed to pray their own blasphemous way in Masjid-t-Nabavi. If this blasphemy did not carry death penalty, where else could it be justified?

The limit is for any one to claim to be God himself. Allah settled the possible argumentation on this blasphemy by asking to leave it to Allah. “If any of them should say, ‘I am a God besides him’ such a one We should reward with hell; thus do We reward those who do wrong.’ (Quran 21:29) Obviously ‘the hell’ can’t be in the jurisdiction of temporal authorities. So it should be concluded that blasphemy law is Mullah’s invention in violation of Allah’s law.

Then what arrangement was there in Allah’s planning to restore His glory and Holiness? The answer known to the Muslim Ummah is, the advent of Jesus whose duty assigned by Allah is to break the cross. It is hypothetically for demolishing the faith based upon crucifixion, physically ascension of Jesus to heaven and the mythical paradox leading to blasphemous Son-ship of Jesus held by Christianity.

According to the traditions the promised Messiah’s mission was the answer for the stupendous blasphemy discussed here. For Muslims, he is the MAHDI &MESSAIH being the same person to mean “The promised Messiah guided by Allah”. In 1889 Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmed (as) declared: “I had a significant revelation stating Jesus, son of Mary had died and in his attributes, as had been promised, I am raised (as Promised Messiah)” (Ruh. Khaz. Vol.3 pg.402) Next year he had the commandment to declare himself the Promised Messiah in the spiritual rank of Prophet (as subordinate to Holy Prophet). If the normal death of Jesus is proved, it would give a clean wash to blasphemous faith of Christendom and save the world from the holocaust as warned in Quran. The religion of British Empire is Christianity, there while being a subject of British India, reliance on Allah’s backing only could have made him so bold to declare it. His thesis MASIH HINDUSTAN MEIN (Jesus lived in India) is a great work. The vehemence of apposition from Christian and Muslim factions is understandable.

The most excruciating part of their campaign for Hazrat Ahmed (as) was the derogatory and slanderous attack on the person of Muhammad (PBUH) and his holy family. Needless to besmear these lines with the defilement they committed in collusion with new converts from Mullahs. However befitting retorts from Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmed (as) will obviate the situation.

“It is shuddering to read so many books with derisive language against our Prophet Muhammad (PBUH). I testify tearfully with painted heart that had our children been slain before our eyes, or mutilated our kith and kin; or we be condemned and killed, and our belongings be confiscated; by God, it would have inflicted as much grief as profanation meted out to our Prophet (PBUH) has done.” (Ruh. Khaz. Vol. 5 pg.52)

It must be remembered that blasphemous profanity never provoked any prophet. The reason may be the personality gap between ordinary men and a prophet in terms of personal and spiritual faculties is like that of a prattling baby and a divine being. When Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmed, Promised Messiah died, one of the treasures he left was, bags full of vituperating letters. Speaking about his own fortitude to face hurls of abuses, he wrote: “If any one hurls abuse on my face, not single hair of mine will ruffle.” His advice to his followers was to pay back blissful prayers for the abuses they receive. 
_____________________________________________________________________________

 Love for all & hatred for none                                      With Love to the Muslims of the World