How to save the world from the holocaust as warned in Holy Quran?

Unmindful of glorious tradition set by Muhammad (PBUH) and the limits laid down in Quran, any man made dogma may amount to interpolation of Quranic Laws. Allah disapproves death penalty and the kind of law enacted in Pakistan.

Merits of Section 295(C): A columnist commented in DAWN dated 9/9/01 “In 1986, the criminal law (Amendment act III) was passed by the hand-picked pious members of champion of Islam General Zia ul Haq’s Majlis-e-Shoora headed by Mohammad Khan Junejo and it added section 295(C), a weapon designed to be used for personal vengeance, a weapon with scores can be settled, a weapon even to be employed for personal gain. It reads; whoever by words,, either spoken or written or by visible representation, or by imputation, innuendo, or insinuation, directly or indirectly, defiles the sacred name of the Holy Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) shall be punished with death, or imprisonment for life, and shall be liable to fine.”

Clerics demonize faithful in Mosques: A sub caption in DAWN dated 8/7/02 was “Imam two others held for attacking U.S Muslim.” A man named Faraz Javed an American by birth went to Jaranwala Faisalabad for Juma prayers. He objected to the Pesh Imam’s political speech. At that time the Imam was cursing the Pakistan government and Americans. At this, Faraz reportedly asked the Imam “Instead of blaming America you should better tell us Islamic teachings.” The Pesh Imam did not like it. He asked people sitting in the mosque to kill Faraz. “ He is also an American enemy of the Muslims.” He managed to escape from the mosque. After Juma prayers Imam Hafiz Abdul Latif was present. Some of the attackers were also carrying iron rods, sticks and lethal weapons. Only two days before this incident, there was news from the same place faisalabad, reported in DAWN dated 6/7/02, under a caption “Villager stoned to death on Imam’s call” – ‘A man of Chak Jhumra was stoned to death on Friday by villagers on call of a local Pesh Imam who had issued a decree (Fatwa) against the man accusing him of blasphemy. Maulvi Faqur Muhammad asked the enraged mob to stone him. Zahid shah sustained serious injuries during the stoning and died on the spot.’

A Bishop committed suicide:  One Masih was charged with blasphemy under the section 295(C) on the complaint of Muhammad Akram on 14/10/1996, after 7 hours of alleged utterances which he said against Islam and the Holy Prophet (PBUH). The section Judge Sahiwal had awarded death sentence to the accused on 27/4/1998. Lahore high Court confirmed his death on 24/7/2001. Then news came in DAWN dated 16/8/02 “SC ACQUITS BLASPHEMY ACCUSED”. It was pleaded in Supreme Court that Muhammad Akram wanted to grab the plot of land on which Ayub Masih and his father were resisting. It was brought on the record of the court that soon after the arrest of Ayub Masih, the complainant Muhammad Akram forcibly occupied his house in Chak No-352 falling in the jurisdiction of Arifwala Police Station. During the process Bishop John Joseph of Faisalabad had committed suicide out side the District and Session Judge, Sahiwal, after hearing the judgment earlier.

One may wonder why it not occurred to any of the Muslims involved in the judicial process to refer to Allah’s Law: “When ye hear the message of Allah held in defiance and ridicule, you are not to sit with them unless they turn to different theme.” (Quran 4:140) Why did Muhammad Akram rejoice blasphemous talk for seven long hours in defiance of Allah’s guidance in Quran?

A case of blasphemy at human level is also available in Quran. Allah charge sheeted one hypocrite named Abdullah Bin Ubai for uttering blasphemous words against Holy Prophet Muhammad (PBUH). “If we return to Madina, surely the more honorable will expel there from the manner (Allah forbid Holy Prophet)”. (Quran 63:8) The son of this hypocrite who had accepted Islam sought permission to behead his father. It was not allowed. When Abdullah Bin Ubai died, his funeral was prayed by Muhammad (PBUH) “When 'Abdullah bin 'Ubai died, his son 'Abdullah bin 'Abdullah came to Allah's Apostle and asked him to give him his shirt in order to shroud his father in it. He gave it to him and then 'Abdullah asked the Prophet to offer the funeral prayer for him (his father). Allah's Apostle got up to offer the funeral prayer for him, but Umar got up too and got hold of the garment of Allah's Apostle and said, "O Allah's Apostle Will you offer the funeral prayer for him though your Lord has forbidden you to offer the prayer for him" Allah's Apostle said, "But Allah has given me the choice by saying: '(Whether you) ask forgiveness for them, or do not ask forgiveness for them; even if you ask forgiveness for them seventy times..' so I will ask more than seventy times." 'Umar said, "But he ('Abdullah bin 'Ubai) is a hypocrite!" However, Allah's Apostle did offer the funeral prayer for him whereupon Allah revealed: 'And never (O Muhammad) pray for anyone of them that dies, nor stand at his grave.'”

There are so many exponential verses in Holy Quran on the subject of blasphemy. “Mocked were (many) messengers before thee; but their scoffers were hemmed in by the thing they mock.” (Quran 6:10 & 21:41) It implied the logic of turning of table. So the subject of settling the score is beyond human reach. Where there is talk of blasphemy, Quran commands to keep away from them. “When ye hear the message of Allah held in defiance and ridicule, you are not to sit with them unless they turn to a different theme.” (Quran 4:140) Pakistan by inventing blasphemy law against Allah’s will tarnished the name of Islam world over.

Can there be any blasphemy severe than Allah begetting a SON, which Saudi commentators say, lowers Allah to the level of an animal? Allah’s indignation for the inglorious attribute framed at human level should take human race stunned and terrified. Reflect on Allah’s warning: “And they say, ‘The Gracious God has taken unto Himself a son.’ Assuredly, you have done a most monstrous thing! The heavens might well-nigh burst thereat, and the earth cleaves asunder, and the mountains fall down in pieces, because they ascribe a son to the Gracious God.” (Quran 19:88-90).

The most monstrous utterance of blasphemy is the belief Allah begetting a son. It is stupendous blasphemy against Allah. In spite of this, when Christians delegate headed by a Bishop came to Madina from Najaf for a debate with Muhammad (PBUH), they were allowed to pray their own blasphemous way in Masjid-t-Nabavi. If this blasphemy did not carry death penalty, where else could it be justified?

The limit is for any one to claim to be God himself. Allah settled the possible argumentation on this blasphemy by asking to leave it to Allah. “If any of them should say, ‘I am a God besides him’ such a one We should reward with hell; thus do We reward those who do wrong.’ (Quran 21:29) Obviously ‘the hell’ can’t be in the jurisdiction of temporal authorities. So it should be concluded that blasphemy law is Mullah’s invention in violation of Allah’s law.

Then what arrangement was there in Allah’s planning to restore His glory and Holiness? The answer known to the Muslim Ummah is, the advent of Jesus whose duty assigned by Allah is to break the cross. It is hypothetically for demolishing the faith based upon crucifixion, physically ascension of Jesus to heaven and the mythical paradox leading to blasphemous Son-ship of Jesus held by Christianity.

According to the traditions the promised Messiah’s mission was the answer for the stupendous blasphemy discussed here. For Muslims, he is the MAHDI &MESSAIH being the same person to mean “The promised Messiah guided by Allah”. In 1889 Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmed (as) declared: “I had a significant revelation stating Jesus, son of Mary had died and in his attributes, as had been promised, I am raised (as Promised Messiah)” (Ruh. Khaz. Vol.3 pg.402) Next year he had the commandment to declare himself the Promised Messiah in the spiritual rank of Prophet (as subordinate to Holy Prophet). If the normal death of Jesus is proved, it would give a clean wash to blasphemous faith of Christendom and save the world from the holocaust as warned in Quran. The religion of British Empire is Christianity, there while being a subject of British India, reliance on Allah’s backing only could have made him so bold to declare it. His thesis MASIH HINDUSTAN MEIN (Jesus lived in India) is a great work. The vehemence of apposition from Christian and Muslim factions is understandable.

The most excruciating part of their campaign for Hazrat Ahmed (as) was the derogatory and slanderous attack on the person of Muhammad (PBUH) and his holy family. Needless to besmear these lines with the defilement they committed in collusion with new converts from Mullahs. However befitting retorts from Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmed (as) will obviate the situation.

“It is shuddering to read so many books with derisive language against our Prophet Muhammad (PBUH). I testify tearfully with painted heart that had our children been slain before our eyes, or mutilated our kith and kin; or we be condemned and killed, and our belongings be confiscated; by God, it would have inflicted as much grief as profanation meted out to our Prophet (PBUH) has done.” (Ruh. Khaz. Vol. 5 pg.52)

It must be remembered that blasphemous profanity never provoked any prophet. The reason may be the personality gap between ordinary men and a prophet in terms of personal and spiritual faculties is like that of a prattling baby and a divine being. When Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmed, Promised Messiah died, one of the treasures he left was, bags full of vituperating letters. Speaking about his own fortitude to face hurls of abuses, he wrote: “If any one hurls abuse on my face, not single hair of mine will ruffle.” His advice to his followers was to pay back blissful prayers for the abuses they receive. 
_____________________________________________________________________________

 Love for all & hatred for none                                      With Love to the Muslims of the World

Non Ahmadi Muslims really follow Holy Prophet of Islam?

We believe that Jesus was a prophet raised by God only for the Israelites. He gave the glad tidings to his people of a Noble Messenger who will come after him in the name of ‘Ahmad’ for the complete teaching which would stay forever with mankind. All Muslims believe that this prophecy was fulfilled in the person of Muhammad (PBUH), 1500 years ago in Makkah. Holy Quran records the biblical prophecies in the following verse:

 وَإِذۡ قَالَ عِيسَى ٱبۡنُ مَرۡيَمَ يَـٰبَنِىٓ إِسۡرَٲٓءِيلَ إِنِّى رَسُولُ ٱللَّهِ إِلَيۡكُم مُّصَدِّقً۬ا لِّمَا بَيۡنَ يَدَىَّ مِنَ ٱلتَّوۡرَٮٰةِ وَمُبَشِّرَۢا بِرَسُولٍ۬ يَأۡتِى مِنۢ بَعۡدِى ٱسۡمُهُ ۥۤ أَحۡمَدُ‌ۖ فَلَمَّا جَآءَهُم بِٱلۡبَيِّنَـٰتِ قَالُواْ هَـٰذَا سِحۡرٌ۬ مُّبِينٌ۬ (٦)

“And remember when Jesus, son of Mary, said, ‘O children of Israel, surely I am Allah’s Messenger unto you, fulfilling that which is before me of the Torah, and giving glad tidings of a Messenger who will come after me. His name will be Ahmad.’ And when he came to them with clear proofs, they said, ‘This is clear enchantment.’” (Holy Qur'an, 61:6)

Reflect on the word ‘Ba’adee’ meaning ‘after'. So called non Ahmadi Ulema interpret it as “After the death” of Muhammad (PBUH) while referring the Hadith ‘La-Nabiyya-ba’adee’. So, in the verse quoted above we must take alike meaning of ‘Ba’adee’ to mean ‘after the death of Jesus’. Therefore, according to its real and true meaning the word ‘Ba’adee’ in the verse proves Jesus’ death. Obviously, the belief about Ahmad that he has arrived in the person of Muhammad (PBUH) also proves his death since, ‘Ba’adee’ only to mean ‘after the death of Jesus’. Yet, if Jesus is alive then how could they believe that Ahmad has come? He can’t come until Jesus is alive!!!!

Now contrary to common sense, Non Ahmadi Muslims believe that Jesus Christ is going to come again. In what capacity then they are going to accept the Holy Prophet (PBUH)? It also needs to be considered that the general run of Muslims would find themselves in a situation of denial of Holy Prophet (PBUH) and they would begin to wait for a prophet who would appear in the name of Muhammad-an after the demise of Jesus, since the prophecy of Jesus in Hebrew Bible demands a prophet will come after him in the name of "Muhammad-an”. Hence, Holy Quran rejects the Mullah’s belief about Jesus being alive.

Alas! Khatam-e-Nabuwwat Mullahs motto “NO PROPHETS AFTER MUHMMAD (PBUH)” is only a propaganda for collecting the funds. No doubt! The word “Islam” has become the mean of biggest business and only source of survival for them.They deny the Holy Prophet of Islam by believing in the life of Jesus. Hence, Mullahs interpretation of Islam and Holy Prophet as ‘Khataman Nabiyyeen’ is false. 

In the view of Ahmadiyya belief, Jesus had died in India 2000 years ago and ‘beyond any shadow of doubt, Holy Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) is Khataman Nabiyyeen, i.e., the Seal of the Prophets. In him the excellences of prophethood have reached their perfection and therefore, the door to receiving prophethood independently is closed since his appointment to this office. Henceforth, every kind of Grace is attainable only through serving him. Prophet shall appear only through allegiance to him, by receiving light from his light and as his shadow and reflection, and not otherwise. Hence, "all prophethood except Muhammadan prophethood has ended. No law-giving prophet shall ever come, and a prophet without law may, but only such as is primarily a follower of the Holy Prophet (PBUH). I am both a follower and a Prophet.’ (Tajalliyate Ilahiyya by Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, pp. 24-25)

Let’s leave it to the readers to ponder over that why Non Ahmadiyya Muslims beliefs are in contradiction with the Holy Quran and the Bible? Can Mullahs justify? Are they really not denying Holy Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) by believing in ‘Jesus is still alive today’?

Ahmadi Muslims believe: ‘Life of Islam is in the death of Jesus so let him die!’
_________________________________________________________________

 Love for all & hatred for none                                 With Love to the Muslims of the World

Why Muhammad (PBUH) made Imam Mahdi incumbent on Muslims if he was not a Prophet?

In the following verse of Holy Quran, Allah states the fundamental beliefs in which a Muslim must believe:

 ‘It is not righteousness that you turn your faces to the East or the West, but truly righteous is he who believes in Allah and the Last Day and the angels and the Book and the Prophets, and spends his money for love of Him, on the kindred and the orphans and the needy and the wayfarer and those who ask for charity, and for ransoming the captives; and who observes Prayer and pays the Zakat; and those who fulfil their promise when they have made one, and the patient in poverty and afflictions and the steadfast in time of war; it is these who have proved truthful and it is these who are the God-fearing.’ (Al-Baqarah 2:177)

Out of the six principles quoted above, only ONE refers to man, and that is PROPHETS. So among men, except for the prophets, the Holy Quran does not make it incumbent on us to believe in any man but only the prophets are for us to believe in. Thus, according to Quran we must have to believe in the prophets only among the men, otherwise we will become kafirs.

Similarly, Holy Prophet of Islam declares Imam Madi a part of FAITH, whosoever denies Imam Mahdi, and whoever opposes him would go out of the pale of Islam. According to Holy Prophet, a time will come when Imam Mahdi would appear in the Muslim Ummah. Our beloved master is reported to have said:

"When you see him (Imam Mahdi) then certainly perform bait to him even if you have to crawl over your knees through the mountains of snow because he (Imam Mahdi) will be the Khalifa of God." (Mastadarrak Hakim Kitab al-Fitn Wal Malaham Chapter Khuroojal Mahdi)

"One who dies without accepting the Imam (Appointed by Allah) of the time, his death is a death in disbelief". (Masnad Ahmad ibn Hanble Vol. 4 Page 96)

"One who obeyed Imam Mahdi obeyed me; one who disobeyed him disobeyed me" (Biharul Anwaar Vol. 13 Page 17)

"One who rejected Imam Mahdi he did kufr" (Hajj Al-Kiramah page 351, as well as Lawaih Al-Anwaar Al-Baheema Vol. 2 page 88)

Can Mullahs tell us: Why Muhammad (PBUH) made Imam Mahdi incumbent on us if he is not a Prophet? Can they quote one verse form the Holy Quran where apart from the prophets; we are bound to believe in anybody?

Hence, whoever is appointed by Allah, is a prophet. Not a single man on earth appeared in history who was not a prophet. In fact a single man can not be quoted from the entire history of all the religions where a man can be said to have been appointed directly by Allah, and to believe in him is not imperative. Therefore from among men, except for prophets, we are not bound to believe in anybody.

So, why Mullahs believe that NOT even a subordinate prophet would ever come after Holy Prophet (PBUH)? While they believe that that Imam Mahdi will be appointed by Allah and he will be the Imam for the whole Ummah and for the whole universe. They are most surely contradicting their own claim. The truth is that they believe in a subordinate prophet, the moment they believe in Imam Mahdi.

Now, it’s up to the readers to judge! As far as the beliefs are concerned, any honest and true person will have to agree and admit that the concept of Imam Mahdi is exactly that concept which Ahmadis term as a subordinate prophet. Whether Mullahs call him a subordinate prophet or not, whether they call him man or not, is not important. What is important is definition. If Mullahs call a man a dog, he still remains a man. If someone enjoys the two qualities of Imam Mahdi, he will remain a prophet, whatever you call him. Even if you do not believe in him, he will still remain a prophet.


Yet again, sincerely ask yourself: WHAT IS THE TRUE INTREPRETATION OF ‘Khatam-un-Nabeen’? If Muhammad (PBUH) is last Prophet, then why to believe in Imam Mahdi? 

_________________________________________________________________
 Love for all & hatred for none                                 With Love to the Muslims of the World

Exposing lies of Mullahs: Did Hazrat Mirza Ghulam (as) claim of being Pregnant?

It is a pity, the MULLAHS of our time do not ponder over the words of the Holy Quran. They have forbidden themselves to go deep into its meaning. Little wonder, they miss the beauty and the significance which lies underneath the surface of the Holy Text. But if Mullahs had read the writings of the early doctors of Islam, (writings based on the Holy Quran and on the lives and experiences of early prophets), they would have found the truth. They are blind and deaf. How on earth would they be willing to accept any ounce of logic, especially in terms of religion? Why should such spiritual birth be impossible or difficult in the case of the Promised Messiah, Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmed (as)?

Not doubt! Mullahs are blaspheming Allah by raising this objection that He had sex with Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmed (as). This stupid objection is not only an attack on Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmed (as) but also on Holy Quran. They are also abusing Hazart Maryam that she had sex with Allah and that's how Jesus was born. This is the reflection of their mindset and the base of their allegation on Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmed (as). It seems as they are living in the valley of SEX and there is nothing positive in their minds!

In response to the shameful question that comes in Mullah’s dirty minds every time, first they should prove us that Allah had SEX with Hazrat Maryam? (Naozbillah) This is what it is in their minds which they are hiding. Such allegations can not be raised until the relationship between Allah and Hazrat Maryam can not be proved in the first place by them.

God has identified particularly two women as the symbol of true believers in Holy Quran. Maryam (Mary) and Assiya (Pharao's wife), God also declares that if a person reaches a certain point in purity and devotion then they can be comparable to these two pious women. That is why Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmed (as) has called himself Mary in this respect that he was the man of God who reached the maximum point of dedication and was now equal to the purity of Mary. The name Maryam has been used to describe a spiritual condition by the Holy Quran, it states:

"And Allah sets forth for those who believe the example of the wife of Pharaoh when she said, `My Lord! Build for me a house with Thee in the Garden and deliver me from Pharaoh and his work and deliver me from the wrong-doing people." "And the example of Mary, the daughter of Imran, who guarded her chastity; so We breathed into her of Our Spirit and she fulfilled in her person the Words of her Lord and His Books, for she was one of the obedients." (Quran 66: 11-12)

In this passage believers are likened to the wife of the Egyptian Pharaoh who persecuted Moses. She sought her end in Heaven, in the nearness of God, and she asked for release from the Pharaoh and his machinations and from partnership in his cruel deeds. Believers are also likened to Mary, the daughter of Imran. She guarded her chastity and she received the revelation of God and affirmed the truth of God's teaching and His Books. She proved to be one of the most loyal servants of God. Here, believers are described as of two types: the type which is like the wife of Pharaoh, and the type which is like Mary. It is obvious that at least one type of believers is Mary-like. 

If, therefore, the Promised One is called, son of Mary, it might mean that this Promised One will have his origin in a Mary-like condition, and that growing out of this, will attain to a Jesus-like condition. It might mean that the earlier life of the Promised One will be holy and spotless even as Mary was holy and spotless, his later life being akin to that of Jesus. Jesus received sustenance and support from the Holy Spirit, so will the Promised One. Jesus devoted his life to the service of truth and goodness, so will the Promised One.

And, if Mullahs have problems understanding this ideology of being Maryam then they might consider them to be equal to pharaoh’s wife or and then bear the consequences afterwards if they want to call themselves MOMIN. They have no choice but to be Pharaoh’s wife and they must think how Pharaoh will treat them.  Yet, if they want to be saved from Pharaoh, then entirely deny being MOMIN in the first place!

After denying the above options, the only option would be to be identified with either of the only other two categories of human beings known to the Holy Quran and be named after either of them. The Holy Quran states:

'God sets forth for an example to the unbelievers the wife of Noah and the wife of Lut: They were [respectively] under two of our righteous Servants, but they were false to their [husbands], and they profited nothing before God on their account but were told: Enter ye the Fire along with [others] that enter.' (Quran 66: 1o)

Once again, one leaves the choice to the Mullahs to decide which of the four categories of human beings known to the Quran they would prefer to be identified with and named after. If they considers being named after any four of these women as a ridiculous idea, then they would be suggesting that they are not a human being at all since the Holy Quran does not know of a fifth category of the human species. In that event, may one enquire of Mullahs as to what are they? Are they Monkeys and Swine if not human being?

________________________________________________________________
 Love for all & hatred for none.                                With Love to the Muslims of the World

Did Allah’s wrath not descend on Pakistan after 1974 comparing to how peaceful and contented Pakistan was before that?

"Whose words can be truer than Allah’s?” (Quran: 4:122) Allah’s law is to exact retribution from those who reject his signs. Referring to the people of Hud (as) Allah revealed: “And we cut off the roots of those who rejected our signs and did not believe.” (Quran: 7:72) This is variously warned in Holy Quran.

HEAVENLY SIGNS: Throughout 120 years of history Ahmedis were nurtured spiritual way under the shadow of perpetual heavenly signs. How can they reject all this? Take few irrefutable signs. It is oft repeated warning in Quran that the one who invents a lie against Allah will be destroyed. “And if the messenger were to invent any saying in our name, We should certainly seize him by his right hand, and we should certainly then cut off the artery of his heart” (Quran:69:44-46) “Who then does more wrong than one who utters a lie concerning Allah?” (Quran: 39:32)

Saudi commentators wrote: “Suppose for a moment that he is a liar and pretender, he will suffer for his falsehood, but why should you turn against Allah? But suppose he is really inspired by Allah to tell you the truth and warn you against evil, what will be your fate when Allah’s wrath descends? For it must descend if he is a true messenger sent by Allah. (Quran: 40:28)

Every false prophet after the Holy Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) did not prosper, but if Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmed (as) was not from Allah, then why his community survived 120 years? READ - Help for true Messengers, punishment for pretenders.

TAKE LESSONS FROM AFGHANISTAN: Hazrat Maulvi Abdul Latif accepted Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmed, he was declared an apostate and stoned to death, Hazrat Ahmed administered a curse on the soil of Afghanistan in the year 1903. “Now what to entail this merciless murder of the kind unheard of under the heaven is waited to be seen. O ye ignorant Amir, what have you done. You made worthy of your own destruction by committing this merciless murder. O ye soil of Kabul bear witness (To this pronouncement) that ye stand charged of having committed a serious crime. O ye ill fated land, you are cast down in the eyes of God and turned to be the land of monstrous outage.” (Ruh. Khaz. Vol 20 P-74) The kingdom was soon liquidated by murder and banishment. Hundred years of human crisis in that country is known to all.

PAKISTAN WARNED: In the year 1947 for supporting Pakistan Movement, an Indian daily tauntingly reminded Hazrat Mirza Bashiruddin Mahmud Ahmed what Afghanistan has done to them. He replied: “Have you not seen what our Lord of retribution has done to Afghanistan? The same will be the fate of Pakistan if they also did it.” (Al Fazl 19/5/1947) Pakistan emulated and the cursive prediction is being proved one after the other. What was Pakistan before 1974 comparing to what it is today. Pakistan turned to be a hub of crime and corruption, misery and destruction.

     

Mr Bhottu is who expelled Ahmedis from Islam. Hazrat Ahmed forewarned in 1891: “With regard to the death of a person Allah revealed to me that his age will not exceed 52 years and that he will die within the course of 52nd year”. (Vol 3 P-190) Mr, Bhottu who declared Ahmedis Non-Muslims, was hanged in his 52nd year. The entire Nation prayed for long life of Mr, Bhutto after Juma Prayer in all mosques on 13th Sept.74. Allah rejected this massive prayer and approved the prayer of only person Hazrat Mirza Nasir Ahmed: “Allah affectionately spoke to me in Arabic, ‘I am sufficient for you against who mock “(Al Fazl 11/12/74)

King Faisal had instigated Bhutto to declare Ahmedis Non-Muslim. He was also shot dead by his nephew next year.

Ziaul Haq forbade Ahmedis behaving like Muslims. Soon came the divination from Hazrat Mirza Tahir Ahmed in a Friday sermon on 14th Dec.1984: “When Allah’s settled fate will split you into pieces, your trace and signs shall be erased and that you will be remembered by the world with disgrace and contempt.” Hazrat Mirza Ghula Amed had predicted: “Your enemies will be split into pieces.” Hence, Ziaul Haq was split into pieces in Air Crash. And, also listen to the Mubahila challenge issued to Pakistan.

Maulana Noorani prided having lead Mullahs in the movement to eliminate Ahmedis from Islam. The news appeared in Urdu Daily Janbaz, dated 12/9/03: “Chest pain developed in wash room and he fell. People brought him out” In other words it is latrine where Noorani fell. They avoided the details. He is being celebrated as Imam (Reformist leader) After 1974 it is during his tenure as Imam, Pakistan fell from Allah’s grace and manifested into poverty, crime and corruption resulting great many citizen opting for suicide and crime.

Earth quake destroyed Muzaffarabad: The contemporary eye witness accounts of Allah’s arbitration. It was news in Urdu daily Jang on 16/2/05 that pampering Qadianis and not discriminating them as non-Muslims in passports are the real cause of natural calamities. On October 7 the same year in Mandi Bahasddin, 8 Ahmedis were shot dead by brain washed fanatics. Next day an earth quake destroyed Muzaffarabad that killed 80000 and toppled more than a thousand mosques and madaris. Ahmediyya daily Al-fazl dated on 6/11/05 reported that all Ahmedies in Muzaffarabad were saved. It proved that Allah targeted those who expelled Ahmedis from Islam.

Pakistan after the terrorist attacks on Ahmadi Mosques in Lahore:  The current situation of Pakistan is visible today after the Lahore attacks on May 28, 2010. 86 people were martyred and more than 120 were injured in nearly simultaneous attacks against two mosques.

In response to the terrorist attacks, His Holiness, Hadhrat Mirza Masroor Ahmad (5th Caliph – Head of Ahmadiyya Muslim Community) has issued the following statement: “…The Ahmadiyya Muslim Jama’at is a peace loving true Muslim Jama’at. Thus there will be no improper reaction from any Ahmadi. Our salvation lies in our supplications to God Almighty and we believe that He has, and always will, help us. No terrorist and no government can ever stop the progress of our Jama’at because it is a Divine organisation. May Allah protect all good natured people from the evil acts of those opposed to peace.”

ALLAH REJECTED PRAYERS OF MULLAHS: It was bold headline on 24/4/01 that 2.5 million Hajis lead by Imam of Haj prayed for torrential rain. Next month appeal came from U.N. Secretary General to help draught ridden Afghanistan for two years. Instead of rain there came earth quakes one after the other and then bombardment and destruction in Afghanistan that sustained during Ramzan also. In Pakistan there was a repeated mass prayer for rain on open ground in the year 2000. Failed to have any response Sufi Muhammad exclaimed: “Prayers from no one is being heard in Pakistan” (Daily Express dated 20/11/2000) Allah’s answer is: “Prayers of those without faith is nothing but vain prayer” (Quran: 13:14 and 40:50) As against this Allah,s promise for true Muslims is: “Reflect on example set by Muhammad (saws). One Friday Disciple besought Rasululallah (saws) to pray for rain because they were hard hit by long spell of drought. Muhammad (saws) prayed then and there, and Lo! The rain started soon after and went on till next Friday by when disciples had to seek prayer for cessation of rain. Hazrat Ahmed did warn that by rejecting him no one will become Kafir, but they will be deprived of spiritual privileges. (Ruh. Khaz. Vol. 15 P-432)

Allah’s pronouncement “Who listens to the distressed when he calls on him, and who relieves his suffering and makes you inheritors of the earth.” (Quran: 27:62) “And your Lord says call on me I will answer your (prayer). But those who are too arrogant to serve will surely enter hell debased.” (Quran: 40:60) “When my servants ask thee concerning me, I am indeed close to them, I respond to the prayer of every suppliant when he calleth on me “(Quran: 2:186)

     

DISTINCTION FOR AHMEDIS: The same year 2001, a small group of Ahmedis led by the teacher Bashabi Muhammad reached a place ZOUGOU PANTROUSSI, in Africa. There the people were in dire need of rain. They greeted them and sought to pray for a rain as a sign, if they were Allah’s favorites. They prayed then and there in the after noon and by evening it started raining. Seeing these heavenly favours, 4000 people came into fold of Ahmediyya Jama’t. (Al Fazl dated 20/12/01) Rejection of prayers by 2.5 million sanctified Hajis is thought provoking. The same time Allah’s answer to Ahmedis proved that they are truly Allah’s favorites.

When Ziaul Haque made it impossible for the head of the community to function here, he migrated to London. It was the occasion for Ahmediyya community to pray in distress. The reward is now visible to the world as promised by God in Quran. All that forbidden on earth in Pakistan including Kalima Tayyiba, are being showered through space round the clock by way of MTA. Great many Ahmedis will testify the good tidings given by God about the progress made thereafter. There were only 40 missions abroad at that time, now it is more than 200.

MULLAH’S JUDGMENT: The recompense for the glorious achievement is announced by ‘Majlis-e-Khatm-e-Nubuwwat’ “Mirza Ghulam Ahmed Qadiani and his followers are all liars, Kafirs, apostates, imposters, cheats, unbelievers and Dualist-infidels” (Gift for Qadianis. P-227) No wonder why over Muslims opposed to Ahmedis are deprived of spiritual relations with Allah as admitted by themselves.

 ALLAH’S JUDGMENT: “Nor would thy Lord be the one to destroy the towns unjustly while their people are righteous. (Quran: 11:117) “Think ye, if the punishment of Allah comes to you, whether suddenly or openly, will any be destroyed except those who do wrong?” (Quran: 6:47) “In the end we deliver our messengers and those who believe. Thus it is fitting on our part that we should deliver those who believe!” (Quran: 10:103).Hazrat Ahmed wrote: “Those who have accepted me as the Promised Messiah, they will remain protected from dangerous situation for their innocence.” (Ruh. Khaz. Vol 3 P-186) Neither would I be undone nor would my followers be given to destruction.” (Ruh. Khaz. Vol 17 P-348) 


_________________________________________________________________
 Love for all & hatred for none.                                With Love to the Muslims of the World

Are the condemned Mullahs TRUE MUSLIMS?

Right from the Biblical era down to our times, revealed scriptures, prophets, divines, intellectuals, jurists and all those who matter condemned perverted Mullahs as abominable as that of lower animals down to all inhuman varieties unworthy of being Muslim.  It is not sufficient for Mullahs to worry about themselves rather than chasing blameless Ahmadis from Islam? Had there been any provisions in Islam to expel any one from Ummat, the foremost choice ought to have been for such Mullahs. Are not hardened criminals who exult about as true Muslims in Pakistan detrimental to the fair name of Islam?

Allah states in the Holy Quran, ‘The Arabs of the desert say, ‘We believe.’ Say, “You have not believed yet; but rather say, ‘We have accepted Islam,’ for the true belief has not yet entered into your hearts.” But if you obey Allah and His Messenger, He will not detract anything from your deeds Surely, Allah is Most Forgiving, Merciful.’ (Surah Hujurat, 49:14)

Allah has not given anyone authority to call anyone from any Sect of Islam as Non-Muslim because in the eyes of Allah as per saying of the Holy Prophet of Islam who ever calls a Muslim as Non-Muslim, himself becomes a Non-Muslim. Usamah ibn Zaid relates: ‘The Holy Prophet (pbuh) sent us on a scouting expedition to Huraqah, a valley of Juhnah and we arrived at its springs in the morning. A man of the Ansar and I came upon one of their men and when we had covered him he called out: There is none worthy of worship save Allah. On this the Ansari held back, but I finished him off with my spear. When we returned to Medina, this incident came to the knowledge of the Holy Prophet (pbuh), he asked me: Usama, did you kill him after he had affirmed: There is none worthy of worship save Allah? I said: Messenger of Allah, he made the affirmation only to save himself. He said again: Did you kill him after he had affirmed: There is none worthy of worship save Allah? He went on repeating it till I wished I had not accepted Islam before that day." Another version is "Holy Prophet said: Did he affirm: There is none worthy of worship save Allah; and yet you killed him? I said: Messenger of Allah, he said it out of fear of our arms. He said: Why did you not cleave his heart to discover whether he had said it from his heart or not? He kept repeating it till I wished I had accepted Islam only that day.’ (Riyadh as-Salihin, ch.49, No.396 on the authority of Bokhari and Muslim)

In another Hadith narrated by Anas bin Malik: Allah's Apostle said, "I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.' And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah." Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, "O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?" He replied, "Whoever says, 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah', faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have." (Sahih Bukhari, Volume 1, Book 8, and No.387)

It is not a simple and unaccountable action to call another a disbeliever. The Holy Prophet Muhammad (saw), the Seal of the Prophets, said: 'If a man says to his brother, O Kafir (disbeliever)! Then surely one of them is such (i.e., a Kafir).' (Bukhari, Vol.8 Book 73, No.125d)

Another Hadith records: Some people asked Allah's Apostle, "Whose Islam is the best? i.e., (Who is a very good Muslim)?" He replied, "One who avoids harming the Muslims with his tongue and hand". (Bukhari, Vol.01, Book 02, No.10)

According to above quoted verse and the sayings of the Holy Prophet (saw), who recites ‘Laila ha illalahu Muhammedur Rasool Allah’ and claims to be a Muslim automatically enters the fold of Islam.

Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad of Qadian, The Promised Messiah and Imam Mahdi (as) has said: "Fear God Almighty and hold back your tongue from denouncing me as a disbeliever, God Almighty knows well that I am a Muslim. I believe in Allah, His angels, His books, His Messengers and Resurrection after death. I bear witness that there is no God except Allah, the One without associate; and I bear witness that Muhammad is His servant and Messenger. Fear Allah and say not: You are not a Muslim. Fear the King to Whom you will be brought back." Izala-e-Auham, Ruhani Khaza'in, Vol.03, P.102)

________________________________________________________________
 Love for all & hatred for none.                                With Love to the Muslims of the World

Kalima Tayyiba forbidden for Ahmadis in Pakistan

One may wonder how could religionists who claim to belong to Quran and Muhammad (saw) impute this kind of allegation without fear of Allah’s lash back for crossing the limit. Can any one infer by reading the books of Hazrat Ahmed that when Ahmedis recite Kalima at heat they mean Mirza Ghulam Ahmed instead of Muhammad (saw). They erased Kalima from Ahmediyya mosques and imprisoned great many Ahmedis for reciting and writing Kalima. The answer for them is in Quran: “What! Have they settled some plan (among themselves)? But it is we who settle things.”(3:79) Men cannot settle the high affairs of the universe. If they plot against the truth, the truth will destroy them, just as, if they accept the truth, the truth will make them free. It is Allah who disposes of affairs. The credibility of Kalima Tayyiba by Ahmadis could have been clarified just by asking school going Ahmadi children to recite Kalima and then to ask them to name the parentage of Muhammad (saw) named therein. Alas!  Had judiciary use their common sense? 

_________________________________________________________________
 Love for all & hatred for none.                                With Love to the Muslims of the World